False Teaching Doctrine Watch: When Churches Start Calling Sin Holy

[David]

The Rise of “Post-Evangelical” Christianity

Something serious is happening in parts of American Christianity.

A growing movement is not merely questioning traditional Christian teaching about sexuality. It is openly rejecting what Scripture says and then claiming that rejection is actually an expression of the gospel.

Restore Austin, a church in Texas reportedly numbering around 1,200 members, has become part of what is being called the “post-evangelical” movement. The church openly affirms same-sex relationships, permits LGBTQ leadership, performs same-sex weddings, and presents these positions as consistent with the gospel.

Pastor Zach Lambert recently went even further. During the wedding of a same-sex couple, he reportedly told them that their marriage brought joy to God’s heart.

That is where this becomes more than a disagreement over church policy.

The issue is not whether homosexual people should be treated with kindness, dignity, and compassion. They should. Christians are commanded to love others and proclaim the truth of Christ to everyone.

The issue is whether we have the right to declare that God approves what His Word identifies as sin.

We do not.

Jesus Himself grounded marriage in God’s creation of male and female:

“Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?”

Matthew 19:4-5, KJV

Jesus did not redefine marriage. He pointed back to what God established “at the beginning.”

Paul is equally plain concerning homosexual practice:

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another.”

Romans 1:26-27, KJV

First Corinthians 6 also lists homosexual practice among sins from which people must be saved, and then gives one of the most hopeful statements in the passage:

“And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.”

1 Corinthians 6:11, KJV

That is the gospel response.

The gospel does not tell sinners that their sin is holy. It tells sinners that Christ saves.

There is a tremendous difference between saying, “Come to Christ and be forgiven,” and saying, “God approves what you are doing.”

One is grace.

The other changes God’s verdict on sin.

No pastor, church, denomination, or movement has the authority to do that.

Isaiah warned:

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.”

Isaiah 5:20, KJV

That warning is worth remembering whenever churches begin using Christian language to reverse the moral judgments of Scripture.

Calling something loving does not make it righteous.

Calling something inclusive does not make it biblical.

Calling something an outcome of the gospel does not make it part of the gospel.

God’s Word determines what is true.

This movement is also worth watching because it does not appear to be confined to one congregation. The network associated with this growing “post-evangelical” movement reportedly includes more than 150 churches.

That means this is not simply about one pastor in Austin.

It reflects a larger question facing churches everywhere:

Will Scripture correct the culture, or will the culture be allowed to correct Scripture?

Christians should welcome sinners.

We should love them.

We should tell them about Jesus Christ.

But genuine love does not require us to tell people that God approves what He has called sin.

The church has no authority to rewrite the Word of God.

When Christians begin calling sin holy, they are not making the gospel more compassionate.

They are contradicting the very Word by which the gospel is known.

---

Source: Religion News Service, “Booted from evangelicalism, a progressive, ‘post-evangelical’ church blooms in Texas,” July 28, 2026.

Read the Religion News Service article

 

[bobinfaith]

The Rise of “Post-Evangelical” Christianity Something serious is happening in parts of American Christianity.
A growing movement is not merely questioning traditional Christian teaching about sexuality. It is openly rejecting what Scripture says and then claiming that rejection is actually an expression of the gospel.

Restore Austin, a church in Texas reportedly numbering around 1,200 members, has become part of what is being called the “post-evangelical” movement. The church openly affirms same-sex relationships, permits LGBTQ leadership, performs same-sex weddings, and presents these positions as consistent with the gospel. Pastor Zach Lambert recently went even further. During the wedding of a same-sex couple, he reportedly told them that their marriage brought joy to God’s heart.

That is where this becomes more than a disagreement over church policy.

The issue is not whether homosexual people should be treated with kindness, dignity, and compassion. They should. Christians are commanded to love others and proclaim the truth of Christ to everyone.

The issue is whether we have the right to declare that God approves what His Word identifies as sin.

We do not.

Jesus Himself grounded marriage in God’s creation of male and female:


Jesus did not redefine marriage. He pointed back to what God established “at the beginning.”

Paul is equally plain concerning homosexual practice:


First Corinthians 6 also lists homosexual practice among sins from which people must be saved, and then gives one of the most hopeful statements in the passage:


That is the gospel response.

The gospel does not tell sinners that their sin is holy. It tells sinners that Christ saves.

There is a tremendous difference between saying, “Come to Christ and be forgiven,” and saying, “God approves what you are doing.”

One is grace.

The other changes God’s verdict on sin.

No pastor, church, denomination, or movement has the authority to do that.

Isaiah warned:


That warning is worth remembering whenever churches begin using Christian language to reverse the moral judgments of Scripture.

Calling something loving does not make it righteous.

Calling something inclusive does not make it biblical.

Calling something an outcome of the gospel does not make it part of the gospel.

God’s Word determines what is true.

This movement is also worth watching because it does not appear to be confined to one congregation. The network associated with this growing “post-evangelical” movement reportedly includes more than 150 churches.

That means this is not simply about one pastor in Austin.

It reflects a larger question facing churches everywhere:

Will Scripture correct the culture, or will the culture be allowed to correct Scripture?

Christians should welcome sinners.

We should love them.

We should tell them about Jesus Christ.

But genuine love does not require us to tell people that God approves what He has called sin.

The church has no authority to rewrite the Word of God.

When Christians begin calling sin holy, they are not making the gospel more compassionate.

They are contradicting the very Word by which the gospel is known.

---

Source: Religion News Service, “Booted from evangelicalism, a progressive, ‘post-evangelical’ church blooms in Texas,” July 28, 2026.

Read the Religion News Service article

Good morning, David;

I read and see this all the time. Pastors that publicly lists their accomplishments, happy wife and children, then make statements that counter sola scriptura, and instead install their post evangelical, modern Christianity, etc...revealing their interpretation and twisting their doctrine. Then they walk away and go about their business not realizing the confusing, negative impact it leaves the believer.

The man you mentioned has many, many posts on social media about himself, published books, all disguises of a false teacher. He's not the only one, but many more from past and present.

No wonder we get many questions about the Bible, (thank you, Rose, Yesua888, TitusTwoWife, and that's always a good thing.)

David, I also read and see the good work God continues to do. He gives wisdom to those who sink into God's Word to see the breakdown of misleading post evangelical, modern Christianity, etc...

We also understand interpretation and opinion evolves around good discipleship but we who receive what's presented are also equipped with "spiritual discernment and ears to hear" that the believer writing or speaking is disciplined in the Bible and can hold sensical, interpretation and opinion.

Application? In the SF Bay Area I have witnessed gays and those who lived in cohabitation, that walk daily with Christ. Instead of hanging on to their rules despite what God says, they have surrendered wholly to Christ and have broken their emotional and mental attraction to the same sex and formed relationships with the opposite sex, got married, had children and are thankful for what God has done. I have witnessed couples who surrendered to God, the CREATOR of marriage. Later they had children and are so relieved they followed God's guidance.

Sad, but what you share will continue to be out there but at the same time God is doing a Mighty and Good Work for those who choose to pray daily (speak to God,) read His Word (God speaks to us) and apply the application of His role for each one of us.

In the book of Joshua he experienced so much of God’s works and blessings. It made sense to serve the True God who had done so much for them. Still, some wanted to serve themselves and their flesh, sort of one foot in the world and one foot toward God. It doesn't work that way!

Joshua 24:14-15, 14 “Now therefore fear the Lord and serve him in sincerity and in faithfulness. Put away the gods that your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve the Lord. 15 And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” - ESV

Good post, David, this gives us much to think about.

God bless you.

Bob

 

[David]

I read and see this all the time. Pastors that publicly lists their accomplishments, happy wife and children, then makes statements that counter sola scriptura, and instead install their post evangelical, modern Christianity, etc...revealing their interpretation and twisting their doctrine. Then they walk away and go about their business not realizing the confusing, negative impact it leaves the believer.

I agree with what you are saying. This is why I think men like this need to be called out. The problem is not just that they have a different opinion. They are standing in pulpits, calling themselves pastors, and teaching things that plainly contradict the Bible. A lot of people hear the title “pastor” and assume the man must know what he is talking about. That is dangerous.

I also think Joshua 24 fits this perfectly. At some point you have to decide who you are going to believe and serve. You cannot say you follow Christ while rejecting what His Word says because the culture does not like it.

That is really the issue here. I do not care how many books a man has written, how big his church is, or how many followers he has. If what he teaches contradicts Scripture, then Scripture wins every time.

 

[Yesua888]

The Rise of “Post-Evangelical” Christianity

Something serious is happening in parts of American Christianity.

A growing movement is not merely questioning traditional Christian teaching about sexuality. It is openly rejecting what Scripture says and then claiming that rejection is actually an expression of the gospel.

Restore Austin, a church in Texas reportedly numbering around 1,200 members, has become part of what is being called the “post-evangelical” movement. The church openly affirms same-sex relationships, permits LGBTQ leadership, performs same-sex weddings, and presents these positions as consistent with the gospel.

Pastor Zach Lambert recently went even further. During the wedding of a same-sex couple, he reportedly told them that their marriage brought joy to God’s heart.

That is where this becomes more than a disagreement over church policy.

The issue is not whether homosexual people should be treated with kindness, dignity, and compassion. They should. Christians are commanded to love others and proclaim the truth of Christ to everyone.

The issue is whether we have the right to declare that God approves what His Word identifies as sin.

We do not.

Jesus Himself grounded marriage in God’s creation of male and female:


Jesus did not redefine marriage. He pointed back to what God established “at the beginning.”

Paul is equally plain concerning homosexual practice:


First Corinthians 6 also lists homosexual practice among sins from which people must be saved, and then gives one of the most hopeful statements in the passage:


That is the gospel response.

The gospel does not tell sinners that their sin is holy. It tells sinners that Christ saves.

There is a tremendous difference between saying, “Come to Christ and be forgiven,” and saying, “God approves what you are doing.”

One is grace.

The other changes God’s verdict on sin.

No pastor, church, denomination, or movement has the authority to do that.

Isaiah warned:


That warning is worth remembering whenever churches begin using Christian language to reverse the moral judgments of Scripture.

Calling something loving does not make it righteous.

Calling something inclusive does not make it biblical.

Calling something an outcome of the gospel does not make it part of the gospel.

God’s Word determines what is true.

This movement is also worth watching because it does not appear to be confined to one congregation. The network associated with this growing “post-evangelical” movement reportedly includes more than 150 churches.

That means this is not simply about one pastor in Austin.

It reflects a larger question facing churches everywhere:

Will Scripture correct the culture, or will the culture be allowed to correct Scripture?

Christians should welcome sinners.

We should love them.

We should tell them about Jesus Christ.

But genuine love does not require us to tell people that God approves what He has called sin.

The church has no authority to rewrite the Word of God.

When Christians begin calling sin holy, they are not making the gospel more compassionate.

They are contradicting the very Word by which the gospel is known.

---

Source: Religion News Service, “Booted from evangelicalism, a progressive, ‘post-evangelical’ church blooms in Texas,” July 28, 2026.

Read the Religion News Service article

"Good is evil" and "evil is good" and infiltrated "churches" are rife World-wide ... End Times are nigh!

"The primary Bible verse addressing this is Leviticus 18:22, which states, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." This prohibition is reiterated in Leviticus 20:13, which adds that both parties involved "shall be put to death."

"Jesus did not establish a physical building for worship. The search context consistently clarifies that the term "church" (from the Greek ekklesia) refers to an assembly of believers or a spiritual body, not a structure made of brick and mortar. Jesus explicitly taught about the Kingdom of God rather than constructing a physical sanctuary, emphasizing that his followers would gather in homes and communal settings rather than in dedicated religious buildings."

"Jesus did establish a "church" (see Greek meaning) in the sense of organizing a community of followers. He appointed twelve apostles to lead this group and commissioned them to make disciples, with the church officially beginning on the Day of Pentecost after his resurrection. Different traditions interpret the "rock" upon which he would build this church differently: Catholic sources view it as Peter and his successors, while many Protestant and non-denominational perspectives argue it was built upon Peter’s confession of faith in Jesus as the Christ, or upon Jesus himself as the cornerstone."

More "evidence" of man's interpretation ...

 

[Yesua888]

Good morning, David;

I read and see this all the time. Pastors that publicly lists their accomplishments, happy wife and children, then make statements that counter sola scriptura, and instead install their post evangelical, modern Christianity, etc...revealing their interpretation and twisting their doctrine. Then they walk away and go about their business not realizing the confusing, negative impact it leaves the believer.

The man you mentioned has many, many posts on social media about himself, published books, all disguises of a false teacher. He's not the only one, but many more from past and present.

No wonder we get many questions about the Bible, (thank you, Rose, Yesua888, TitusTwoWife, and that's always a good thing.)

David, I also read and see the good work God continues to do. He gives wisdom to those who sink into God's Word to see the breakdown of misleading post evangelical, modern Christianity, etc...

We also understand interpretation and opinion evolves around good discipleship but we who receive what's presented are also equipped with "spiritual discernment and ears to hear" that the believer writing or speaking is disciplined in the Bible and can hold sensical, interpretation and opinion.

Application? In the SF Bay Area I have witnessed gays and those who lived in cohabitation, that walk daily with Christ. Instead of hanging on to their rules despite what God says, they have surrendered wholly to Christ and have broken their emotional and mental attraction to the same sex and formed relationships with the opposite sex, got married, had children and are thankful for what God has done. I have witnessed couples who surrendered to God, the CREATOR of marriage. Later they had children and are so relieved they followed God's guidance.

Sad, but what you share will continue to be out there but at the same time God is doing a Mighty and Good Work for those who choose to pray daily (speak to God,) read His Word (God speaks to us) and apply the application of His role for each one of us.

In the book of Joshua he experienced so much of God’s works and blessings. It made sense to serve the True God who had done so much for them. Still, some wanted to serve themselves and their flesh, sort of one foot in the world and one foot toward God. It doesn't work that way!

Joshua 24:14-15, 14 “Now therefore fear the Lord and serve him in sincerity and in faithfulness. Put away the gods that your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve the Lord. 15 And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” - ESV

Good post, David, this gives us much to think about.

God bless you.

Bob

Hi Bob,

I have been watching a documentary on "Moses" ... it is really good, and is coming "alive" for me ... to see how human Moses was, what he went through to test his faith, deal with disappointment from those that God had sent him to lead out of Egypt etc. After his 40 day absence on Mt Sanai, upon his return, he saw the Israelites worshipping an idol that they made in his absence. There were doubting "Tomases" and "agitators" amongst the people. They thought that Moses was not coming back, and they "as they needed a god to help them find the "promised land", they turned to other gods. Moses was so upset that he smashed the stone tablets with the 10 commandments that he wrote whilst on the mount. Later when he came off the Mount, he pleaded with God to forgive His people (his wife and brother were amongst the crowd). Later Moses and his more faithfull followers, recited the 10 Commandments, so that they could be etched again on stone tablets.

Whilst following the 10 Commandments is following God's Law, there is more in Scripture, especially in the New Testament which shows many fulfilments (completions) of things which began in the Old Testament. The Bible should be read in Whole and not part, nor changed to suit the Times (verses cited taken out of context).

 

[Yesua888]

Hi David,

I read this account, and wonder if this is feeding false information too:

"No, the prohibition against same-sex relations is not one of the Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments, found in Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21, cover specific laws such as prohibiting idolatry, murder, theft, false witness, and adultery. The verses addressing same-sex relations (Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13) are part of the Holiness Code in the book of Leviticus, which contains many other laws distinct from the Ten Commandments.

Could this kind of "teaching" be the reason for so much "division" and therefore "misinformation" regarding what the Scriptures actually say.
It seems to me that many disregard the New Testament; could this mean that they are discounting or dismissing Jesus Christ's mission on Earth, and His fulfillment of many of the teachings in the Old Testament? Does this justify "the church" in changing Scripture to suit the Times? Could it be that the word "church" (the building and it's teachers housed therein) is infiltrated by men and women who are not God's True Children (followers of Christ)>

"While some theological interpretations suggest that same-sex relations fall under the broader principle of the Seventh Commandment ("You shall not commit adultery") as a violation of sexual purity, the specific act is not explicitly listed in the Decalogue." ("Decalogue (from Greek dekalogos, meaning "ten words") refers primarily to the Ten Commandments, the religious and ethical directives given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.")"

 

[David]

Hi David,

I read this account, and wonder if this is feeding false information too:

"No, the prohibition against same-sex relations is not one of the Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments, found in Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21, cover specific laws such as prohibiting idolatry, murder, theft, false witness, and adultery. The verses addressing same-sex relations (Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13) are part of the Holiness Code in the book of Leviticus, which contains many other laws distinct from the Ten Commandments.

Could this kind of "teaching" be the reason for so much "division" and therefore "misinformation" regarding what the Scriptures actually say.
It seems to me that many disregard the New Testament; could this mean that they are discounting or dismissing Jesus Christ's mission on Earth, and His fulfillment of many of the teachings in the Old Testament? Does this justify "the church" in changing Scripture to suit the Times? Could it be that the word "church" (the building and it's teachers housed therein) is infiltrated by men and women who are not God's True Children (followers of Christ)>

"While some theological interpretations suggest that same-sex relations fall under the broader principle of the Seventh Commandment ("You shall not commit adultery") as a violation of sexual purity, the specific act is not explicitly listed in the Decalogue." ("Decalogue (from Greek dekalogos, meaning "ten words") refers primarily to the Ten Commandments, the religious and ethical directives given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.")"

Linda, the statement you quoted is partly true, but it needs some explanation.

It is true that homosexual relations are not separately named in the Ten Commandments. Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are not part of the Ten Commandments. So that statement by itself is not false.

But if someone uses that fact to suggest that homosexual conduct is therefore not condemned by Scripture, that is misleading. We do not determine Christian doctrine by asking only whether something appears among the Ten Commandments. Like you said, we have to read the whole Bible, including what the New Testament plainly teaches.

Romans 1:26-27 directly addresses homosexual relations. Paul describes women changing “the natural use into that which is against nature,” and men “burned in their lust one toward another.” First Corinthians 6:9-11 also identifies homosexual practice among sins from which people had been saved, ending with the wonderful words, “And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified.”

So we do not even need to argue that homosexuality must somehow be placed under the Seventh Commandment. That may be one way to understand the Seventh Commandment, but we do not have to rely on that argument because the New Testament speaks clearly about homosexual conduct.

Jesus also reaffirmed God's order for marriage by going back to creation: “Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female...For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife” (Matthew 19:4-5).

That is why I keep coming back to the whole counsel of Scripture. We cannot take one part of the Bible, isolate it from everything that follows, and then build a doctrine around what that one passage does not say.

As for churches changing Scripture to suit the times, there is never biblical justification for that. Culture does not have authority to correct God's Word. God's Word corrects us. And Paul says of anyone who corrupts the gospel, “If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:9).
And yes, Scripture warns that false teachers can arise among God's people, and will. Paul warned the Ephesian elders that “of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things” (Acts 20:30). Peter likewise warned that “there shall be false teachers among you” (2 Peter 2:1). And as you are seeing, we have plenty of them.

One other point: biblically, the church is the people, the assembly of believers, not the physical building. A building is simply where a congregation may meet. The real issue is not the bricks and mortar. The issue is what the people claiming to teach Christ are actually teaching.

That brings us right back to the question in this thread: Are we going to allow Scripture to tell us what is true, or are we going to change Scripture until it agrees with the culture?

On homosexual practice, the New Testament is not silent. Scripture directly says it. This is not merely our interpretation or an assumption..

 

[bobinfaith]

"Good is evil" and "evil is good" and infiltrated "churches" are rife World-wide ... End Times are nigh!

"The primary Bible verse addressing this is Leviticus 18:22, which states, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." This prohibition is reiterated in Leviticus 20:13, which adds that both parties involved "shall be put to death."

"Jesus did not establish a physical building for worship. The search context consistently clarifies that the term "church" (from the Greek ekklesia) refers to an assembly of believers or a spiritual body, not a structure made of brick and mortar. Jesus explicitly taught about the Kingdom of God rather than constructing a physical sanctuary, emphasizing that his followers would gather in homes and communal settings rather than in dedicated religious buildings."

"Jesus did establish a "church" (see Greek meaning) in the sense of organizing a community of followers. He appointed twelve apostles to lead this group and commissioned them to make disciples, with the church officially beginning on the Day of Pentecost after his resurrection. Different traditions interpret the "rock" upon which he would build this church differently: Catholic sources view it as Peter and his successors, while many Protestant and non-denominational perspectives argue it was built upon Peter’s confession of faith in Jesus as the Christ, or upon Jesus himself as the cornerstone."

More "evidence" of man's interpretation ...

Hi David,

I read this account, and wonder if this is feeding false information too:

"No, the prohibition against same-sex relations is not one of the Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments, found in Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21, cover specific laws such as prohibiting idolatry, murder, theft, false witness, and adultery. The verses addressing same-sex relations (Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13) are part of the Holiness Code in the book of Leviticus, which contains many other laws distinct from the Ten Commandments.

Could this kind of "teaching" be the reason for so much "division" and therefore "misinformation" regarding what the Scriptures actually say.
It seems to me that many disregard the New Testament; could this mean that they are discounting or dismissing Jesus Christ's mission on Earth, and His fulfillment of many of the teachings in the Old Testament? Does this justify "the church" in changing Scripture to suit the Times? Could it be that the word "church" (the building and it's teachers housed therein) is infiltrated by men and women who are not God's True Children (followers of Christ)>

"While some theological interpretations suggest that same-sex relations fall under the broader principle of the Seventh Commandment ("You shall not commit adultery") as a violation of sexual purity, the specific act is not explicitly listed in the Decalogue." ("Decalogue (from Greek dekalogos, meaning "ten words") refers primarily to the Ten Commandments, the religious and ethical directives given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.")"

Hi David,

I read this account, and wonder if this is feeding false information too:

"No, the prohibition against same-sex relations is not one of the Ten Commandments.

The Ten Commandments, found in Exodus 20:1–17 and Deuteronomy 5:4–21, cover specific laws such as prohibiting idolatry, murder, theft, false witness, and adultery. The verses addressing same-sex relations (Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13) are part of the Holiness Code in the book of Leviticus, which contains many other laws distinct from the Ten Commandments.

Could this kind of "teaching" be the reason for so much "division" and therefore "misinformation" regarding what the Scriptures actually say.
It seems to me that many disregard the New Testament; could this mean that they are discounting or dismissing Jesus Christ's mission on Earth, and His fulfillment of many of the teachings in the Old Testament? Does this justify "the church" in changing Scripture to suit the Times? Could it be that the word "church" (the building and it's teachers housed therein) is infiltrated by men and women who are not God's True Children (followers of Christ)>

"While some theological interpretations suggest that same-sex relations fall under the broader principle of the Seventh Commandment ("You shall not commit adultery") as a violation of sexual purity, the specific act is not explicitly listed in the Decalogue." ("Decalogue (from Greek dekalogos, meaning "ten words") refers primarily to the Ten Commandments, the religious and ethical directives given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.")"

Good morning, Yesua888;

Can I get the title of the Moses documentary and where I can watch it, YouTube?

I'd like to share my thoughts. The man mentioned in this subject has many, many posts on social media about himself, published books, all disguises of a false teacher. As Christians we are not to sugar coat the false teacher but expose them reference Titus 1:9 and Romans 16:17.

The 10 Commandments are very complicated, meaning, they were presented to Moses by God to establish a Godly, moral foundation between us existing with Him and with each other. It's only 10 commands, but followers of God or non followers are not able to master them. This is why mercy, forgiveness, Grace and our Savior is very much needed and further study of why.

We emphasize the need to study the Bible so God can speak to us in all ways of being obedient to Him, thus, Leviticus 18:22, 20:13 are clear, specific examples of further commands and instructions from God.

On a personal, side note: I understand why the Hebrew and Greek and their definitions help explain the Scriptures. I know preachers and teachers use them often to get the deeper meaning not provided in English, respectfully, but I'm personally subjective to that. English has multiple definitions demonstrated in the Bible and has the capability to define deeper meanings to arrive at the Hebrew and Greek.

Ever since I learned to read, all Scripture has been in English. When other countries publish Bibles in their own languages it basically equates and arrives back to English when translated. The professors, theologians and scholars (I know a couple of authors) have refuted me in defense of the Hebrew and Greek but for the last 30+ years all my discipleship and application has been from the English.

I'm not saying don't ever refer to the Hebrew and Greek, I would never do that to a fellow believer. I also have to confess I was only an average student of both languages at seminary. I know other students who found these languages fascinating but I didn't enjoy them. Ironically, I excelled in business English and enjoyed the subject.

God bless you, Yesua888.

Bob

 

[Yesua888]

Good morning, Yesua888;

Can I get the title of the Moses documentary and where I can watch it, YouTube?

Hi Bob,

"Moses" is on Netflix, and may also be on Youtube?

Tonight I will see if I can get more info, and whether I can recognise it on Youtube : )

Okay I have found a short, which is on Youtube ... this is what I watched on Netflix "Testament The Story of Moses":

 

[bobinfaith]

Hi Bob,

"Moses" is on Netflix, and may also be on Youtube?

Tonight I will see if I can get more info, and whether I can recognise it on Youtube : )

Okay I have found a short, which is on Youtube ... this is what I watched on Netflix "Testament The Story of Moses":

Good morning, Yesua888;

Thank you. I can access both in our home and am interested in watching.

God bless you, sister.

Bob