All of the word meaning associated with Christ must be sought out. Some it seems confuse Christ the anointing Holy Father not seen with Jesus the Son of man seen .----easy to do
When the apostle Jesus the Son of man was given words from Christ the Holy Father in John 3 the Son of man jesus prophesying to Nicodemus the sign and wonder seeker . Christ prophesied dying mankind must be born again . . .marvel not but rather believe Christ.
The Son of man Jesus not exempt prayed---- not as I will no power to create a new creatures. But you heavenly Father the "Let there be God" and "it was God alone good".
In that way it would seem Born again Jesus as the first born of many
sons of
God is not ashamed to call
us brothers and
sisters
Not the most popular idea but it does ring----- sola scriptura.
Matthew 12:50 For
whosoever shall do the
will of
my Father which is in
heaven, the
same is
my brother, and sister, and mother.
Mark 3:35 For
whosoever shall do the
will of
God, the
same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.
Mr. GLee, I need to confront this directly because what you are promoting is not Christian doctrine. The way you continually split “Christ” from “Jesus,” treating them like two different beings, an invisible divine Christ and a visible human Jesus, is not from Scripture. That teaching matches
Gnostic dualism, which the apostles condemned because it denied that Jesus Christ came in the flesh ~1 John 4:2–3. The Bible never divides Him. “The Word was God… and the Word was made flesh” ~John 1:1,14. Jesus is the Christ. One Person. Fully God. Fully man.
You also said Jesus had “no power to create,” which is exactly what
Arianism teaches, a lesser Jesus who is not eternal God. Scripture refutes that completely. “All things were made by Him” ~John 1:3. “By Him were all things created” ~Colossians 1:16. Denying the Son’s divine power is heresy, not Sola Scriptura.
On top of that, your constant use of hidden symbolism, coded meanings, and allegories that Scripture never gives is nothing but private revelation dressed in biblical language. The Word warns us plainly against this: “No prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation” ~2 Peter 1:20. You are not interpreting Scripture. You are inserting your own system into it.
Your approach also mirrors
esoteric teaching, where everything becomes a secret message and nothing is taken at face value. Paul warned that this kind of teaching comes from those who “intrude into things they have not seen” and become “puffed up without reason” ~Colossians 2:18–19. That is not biblical doctrine. It is confusion.
Let me be very clear for the sake of everyone reading: this mixture of Gnostic dualism, Arian denial of Christ’s divinity, private symbolic revelation, and esoteric reinterpretation will not be tolerated on this forum. Our rules are grounded in Sola Scriptura. We do not allow teachings that redefine who Jesus is or add meanings the Bible never gives.
If you continue promoting these ideas, your account will be removed from the forum. This community exists to defend the truth of God’s Word, not to give space to teachings Scripture itself warns against.